Why “It’s High Quality” Isn’t Evidence, and What Is
Every turf brand claims high quality. It’s a meaningless differentiator until it’s backed by numbers a client, an architect, or a municipal buyer can independently verify. The difference between a sales pitch and a defensible bid usually comes down to whether you can point to a named standard and a tested value, or whether you’re asking the client to take your word for it.
FieldTurf’s residential and commercial systems are built and measured against a specific set of ASTM standards, not vague internal benchmarks. That’s the distinction worth understanding before your next bid, because it’s the difference between “trust me” and “here’s the documentation.”
Backing and Drainage: What Gets Measured and Why It Matters On-Site
Mass per unit area, covering total system weight, pile-yarn weight, and certain component weights, is measured using ASTM D5848. Construction details like tuft-row spacing and stitch configuration are measured to ASTM D5793, which quantifies binding sites per unit length or width. These aren’t cosmetic numbers. A system that’s underweight or loosely constructed is more likely to show seams, shift under traffic, or fail prematurely at a fold or seam line, exactly the kind of callback that erodes a contractor’s margin and reputation.
Drainage is validated separately. FieldTurf’s MaxxFlow backing, used across the fully permeable product lines, is tested for water permeability to DIN 18-035 and rated at 350+ inches per hour. That’s a European sports-surface testing standard, not an invented number, and it’s the kind of citation that holds up if a client or an inspector asks where the drainage claim comes from.
Safety Testing: What Standards Apply and What They Actually Cover
Pile height is measured to ASTM D5823, and yarn linear density (denier) is measured to ASTM D1907/D1907M. Denier is one input among several, alongside polymer type, additives, and yarn design, that affect how a product performs under UV exposure and everyday wear; it isn’t a stand-in for durability on its own. Products also go through separate UV resistance testing and are evaluated for durability under the company’s broader testing and certification process, which covers construction quality, drainage performance, and material resistance to sun and wear over time.
If a client asks what “tested and certified” actually means on a spec sheet, this is the honest answer: it means the specific properties above, mass per unit area, construction density, pile height, and yarn linear density, along with drainage rate, are measured against named, repeatable standards rather than described in marketing language alone.
[PENDING LEGAL REVIEW] PFAS Testing: What It Shows and How to Talk About It Accurately
[PENDING LEGAL REVIEW] This section reflects internal lab data. Legal should review the specific references to the testing lab, EPA methods, detection limits, and any claims about federal or state health-based criteria before this section is used externally. A set of FieldTurf’s LS Fiber yarn products, 13 products plus two duplicate samples, were tested for PFAS in 2024 using US EPA testing methods, including EPA Method 1633 and a modified version of EPA Method 537. This reflects the specific products tested; it is not a claim that covers the entire fiber portfolio, and the specific product line being referenced in any external content should be confirmed against the tested list. The current summary statement for the tested products is this: all products that have been tested for PFAS by US EPA methods are below all US EPA and State human health-based criteria for residential soils.
[PENDING LEGAL REVIEW] That’s a precise claim, and it’s worth using exactly as written rather than simplifying it into “PFAS-free,” which is not what the data supports and not a claim FieldTurf makes. Some individual fiber samples showed no detectable PFAS above the method reporting limit; others showed trace results that still fall below the applicable health-based screening criteria. The accurate, defensible statement covers all of it: every tested product comes in below the health-based criteria that regulators use to evaluate residential soil exposure. If a client pushes for more detail than that, or asks about a specific product line, the right move is to request the specific product documentation rather than improvise an answer on-site.
How to Translate Test Data Into Language a Homeowner or GC Understands
Most clients won’t ask for the ASTM number itself, but they will ask some version of “how do you know this will hold up” or “is this actually safe.” The translation is straightforward: this system is built to specific, independently verifiable standards for weight, drainage, and construction, and it’s been tested for substances of concern using recognized methods, not just described as safe.
That’s a stronger answer than any adjective, and it’s one you can stand behind if someone follows up.
Where to Find the Documentation Behind a Bid
Full technical spec sheets are available by product line and list the exact ASTM values for the system you’re quoting. For PFAS documentation specifically, request the current product-level testing summary before including any specific claim in a client-facing proposal, and confirm whether the specific product you’re quoting was part of the tested sample set, since the applicable products and test results are updated as new lab work is completed.
The next post in this series looks at where these systems are actually built, and what that means for lead times and consistency on your jobs.
Need testing documentation for a specific product or bid?
Talk to a FieldTurf Landscape Sales Rep
- Choosing an Artificial Turf Installer - September 30, 2026
- How to Compare Artificial Turf Quotes - September 30, 2026
- Make Your Turf Estimate Visit Build Trust, Not Just Data - September 30, 2026
